Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit earned on inputs used in the manufacture of branded goods could be denied merely because the manufacturer also cleared unbranded goods at nil rate of duty under the small-scale exemption notification.
Analysis: The dispute was not about credit taken on inputs used in exempted goods. The manufacturer was availing the exemption only for unbranded goods and was utilising Modvat credit in relation to branded goods cleared on duty payment. The mere fact that part of the final product was cleared without duty did not, by itself, disentitle the manufacturer from using the credit lawfully accrued in respect of dutiable clearances. The exemption scheme did not require forfeiture of credit in such a situation.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was not justified and the assessee was entitled to the credit.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because a manufacturer also clears other goods under an exemption, where the credit is utilised in relation to dutiable goods and is not shown to be linked to exempted clearances.