Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied when the assessee acted on the amended Rule 57H after the departmental authority failed to decide the declaration for a long period, and whether the adjudicating authority could reject the credit on grounds not alleged in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The declaration under Rule 57H remained unattended for about 21/2 years despite repeated reminders. The assessee then took credit after informing the Assistant Commissioner and on the basis of the amended provision inserted by Notification No. 8/93-C.E. (N.T.). The show cause notice alleged only that credit had been taken without prior permission, but the adjudication proceeded on different grounds, namely delayed availment and use of duplicate invoices. The finding was that the department could not take advantage of its own inaction, and an adjudication based on grounds not put in the notice was impermissible.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was unsustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the assessee was granted consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication cannot sustain denial of credit on grounds not contained in the show cause notice, and the revenue cannot rely on its own failure to decide a pending declaration to defeat credit otherwise taken under the amended rule.