Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether intravenous cannulae were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 339/86-C.E. as cannulae for long-term use.
Analysis: The departmental appeal did not dispute the finding that the goods were for long-term use. The cited precedent did not address the same factual question and was not applicable to the controversy. The medical certificates relied upon below were observed to treat a cannula as equivalent to an infusion set, but that point was not a ground in the appeal and did not affect the result.
Conclusion: The exemption was held available and the appeal failed.