Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of kutcha delivery orders and delivery of gunnies to third parties amounted only to an assignment of a right to obtain delivery, or constituted a separate sale liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The Mills recognised only the appellants as contracting parties, and the third parties acted only as agents so far as delivery from the Mills was concerned. A delivery order is a document of title to goods under Section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act, and the holder may transfer the right to receive the goods. On the facts, the delivery by the Mills to the third parties and the transfer by the appellants to those third parties were separate in law and in fact, even if contemporaneous in point of time. The third parties purchased the goods for an extra price from the appellants, and any contractual claim lay against the appellants, not the Mills.
Conclusion: The transaction between the appellants and the third parties was a fresh sale, and sales tax was payable at both stages.