Classification of unmachined CI castings required fresh adjudication where the appellate order lacked a reasoned finding on tariff heading and exemption.

Classification of unmachined CI castings under Tariff Heading 73.25 or 84.37 and eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 56/95-C.E. turned on whether the goods were covered by the relevant Board circular and on a reasoned finding as to true classification. The lower appellate authority had relied on the later circular being prospective, but had not examined the earlier circular or recorded a definite classification finding. The matter therefore required fresh adjudication by the Commissioner (Appeals), and the order was set aside by remand.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) had properly decided the classification of unmachined CI castings and whether the matter required fresh consideration.

Analysis: The dispute concerned whether the goods were classifiable under Tariff Heading 73.25 or 84.37 and whether exemption under Notification No. 56/95-C.E. was available. The lower appellate authority set aside the demand mainly on the view that the later Board circular operated only prospectively, but it did not examine whether the goods were actually covered by the earlier circular or record a definite finding on the true classification. In the absence of such an enquiry and a reasoned finding on classification, the order could not be treated as a proper speaking order.

Conclusion: The classification issue required fresh adjudication by the Commissioner (Appeals), and the impugned order was set aside by remand.

---