Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on imported capital goods under Project Import regulations was to be allowed with reference to the date of receipt of the goods or the date of installation, and whether the relevant circular affected the claim.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the timing of eligibility for credit on capital goods received before the relevant amendment to Rule 57Q. The record showed that the circular relied upon by the assessee had not been placed before or considered by the Commissioner. In view of this omission, the matter required fresh examination on the factual and legal questions bearing on eligibility.
Outcome: The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh decision in accordance with law after giving the appellant an opportunity of hearing.