Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate of duty on excess production of sugar was inadmissible merely because there was no production during the corresponding period of the base year, notwithstanding some production in other periods of that base year.
Analysis: The claim was considered in the light of Notification No. 189/73 dated 4-10-1973 as amended. The material point was whether absence of production in the corresponding period of the base year defeated the claim when the record showed that there was some production during the remaining periods of that year. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier decisions holding that the existence of some production in the base year was sufficient and that nil production in the corresponding period did not by itself render the claim inadmissible.
Conclusion: The rebate claim was admissible and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.