Company property dispositions after winding up may be validated only if made in good faith and reasonable for the company's benefit.

A post-commencement disposition of company property under section 227 of the Companies Act, 1948 may be validated only if the applicant acted bona fide and the transaction was a reasonable step for the company's benefit, assessed on just and fair equitable principles. Good faith alone is insufficient where the act is not reasonable in the circumstances. On the facts, the receiver's payment arrangement was upheld because it was made bona fide, no prejudice to creditors was shown, and the broader equities favoured validation rather than allowing a windfall to the liquidator.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the court should validate a disposition of company property made after commencement of winding up under section 227 of the Companies Act, 1948 on the footing that the applicant acted in good faith for the company's benefit. (ii) Whether, on the facts, the receiver had shown a sufficient case for validation, including reasonableness of the decision and absence of prejudice to creditors.

Issue (i): Whether the court should validate a disposition of company property made after commencement of winding up under section 227 of the Companies Act, 1948 on the footing that the applicant acted in good faith for the company's benefit.

Analysis: Section 227 makes post-commencement dispositions void unless the court otherwise orders, but supplies no express test for the exercise of that discretion. The judgment holds that mere bona fides is not enough in every case; the act must also be a reasonable one to do for the company's benefit. The discretion is to be exercised on general equitable principles, asking what is just and fair in the circumstances.

Conclusion: The correct test is not good faith alone, but good faith coupled with reasonableness, applied through a just and fair assessment of the circumstances.

Issue (ii): Whether, on the facts, the receiver had shown a sufficient case for validation, including reasonableness of the decision and absence of prejudice to creditors.

Analysis: The receiver acted bona fide, but the evidence did not sufficiently show investigation, weighing of alternatives, or proper justification for continuing the trading arrangement and accepting repayments in the manner adopted. On appeal, however, the court treated the broader equities as decisive: the payments had enabled advances exceeding the disputed sum, no detriment to creditors was shown, and the liquidator would otherwise obtain a windfall. In those circumstances the disposition was fit to be validated.

Conclusion: The disposition should be validated and the receiver's application should succeed.

Final Conclusion: The post-commencement payment was upheld as a valid disposition under the court's discretionary power, and the receiver obtained relief in respect of the disputed sum.

Ratio Decidendi: Under section 227 of the Companies Act, 1948, a post-commencement disposition may be validated where the applicant acts bona fide and the transaction is, on a just and fair assessment of all the circumstances, a reasonable step for the company's benefit.

---