Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a plaintiff who has a pending action for damages against a company at the time the company was struck off the register is a "creditor" within section 353(6) of the Companies Act, 1948 and therefore entitled to apply for restoration of the company's name to the register.
Analysis: The Court examined the meaning of the word "creditor" in section 353(6) against the statutory context and relevant authorities. Comparative provisions including section 224(1) and earlier case law were considered to determine whether "creditor" should be confined to fixed and ascertained debts or extended to contingent or prospective claims. The Court noted authorities demonstrating a tendency to construe "creditor" broadly (including contingent claims) and found that the purpose of section 353(6) - to provide redress to those who feel aggrieved by a company being struck off - favours a generous construction. The Court rejected alternative routes of relief (Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act, 1930, section 1(1); section 352 time limit) as unavailable in the present circumstances and held that the petitioner's pending unquantified claim for damages falls within the ambit of "creditor" for the purposes of section 353(6).
Conclusion: The word "creditor" in section 353(6) of the Companies Act, 1948 includes a plaintiff with a pending claim for damages (including contingent claims); the petition for restoration of the company's name to the register succeeds in favour of the petitioner.