Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proportionate Modvat credit was reversible or demandable under Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in respect of inputs used in goods cleared under Chapter X procedure and thereafter used in manufacture of final goods exported under bond without payment of duty under Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the ratio of its earlier order on the same issue. It held that clearances under Chapter X procedure are not to be treated as clearances of exempted goods or nil-rated goods. On that basis, the inputs used in the manufacture of final products so cleared were not disqualified for Modvat credit, and no question of reversal of such credit arose. The reliance placed by the Revenue on the Larger Bench decision in Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. was found misplaced because that decision did not deal with the present factual situation involving subsequent export under bond under Rule 13.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of Modvat credit was not sustainable, and the Revenue appeals were rejected.