Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        1968 (3) TMI 37 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Winding-up payments and validation under section 536(2): post-petition debt payments are refundable unless made in bona fide ordinary course transactions. Payments made after the commencement of winding-up are treated as dispositions of company property and, when made toward pre-existing debts, offend pari ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Winding-up payments and validation under section 536(2): post-petition debt payments are refundable unless made in bona fide ordinary course transactions.

                          Payments made after the commencement of winding-up are treated as dispositions of company property and, when made toward pre-existing debts, offend pari passu distribution; they are therefore liable to be refunded to the official liquidator under section 536(2) unless validly protected. Validation under section 536(2) is confined to bona fide transactions entered into in the ordinary course of current trade or for the company's benefit, so post-petition payments of earlier debts do not qualify. The exclusion of the Companies Act in co-operative societies legislation is construed as limited to incorporation, regulation and winding-up of societies, and does not exclude the company court's jurisdiction over a company in liquidation.




                          Issues: (i) Whether payments made by the company in liquidation after the commencement of winding-up were void and refundable to the official liquidator under section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956; (ii) whether the society made out a case for validation of those payments under section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956; (iii) whether the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 were wholly inapplicable to a co-operative society by reason of section 61 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932 and section 129 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964.

                          Issue (i): Whether payments made by the company in liquidation after the commencement of winding-up were void and refundable to the official liquidator under section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.

                          Analysis: The winding-up is deemed to commence from the date of presentation of the petition under section 441(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. Payments made thereafter towards a pre-existing debt were dispositions of the company's property after commencement of winding-up. Such payments offended the scheme of pari passu distribution and could not be treated as valid merely because they were made in discharge of a decree debt.

                          Conclusion: The payments were refundable to the official liquidator under section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the society made out a case for validation of those payments under section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.

                          Analysis: Validation under section 536(2) is confined to transactions that are bona fide and entered into in the ordinary course of the company's current trade or for the company's benefit. Payments made after commencement of winding-up in discharge of earlier debts do not satisfy that standard and cannot be validated on the facts found.

                          Conclusion: The society failed to establish a case for validation of the payments.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 were wholly inapplicable to a co-operative society by reason of section 61 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932 and section 129 of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964.

                          Analysis: The exclusion of the Companies Act in the co-operative societies legislation was read as confined to matters of incorporation, regulation and winding-up of societies, and not as excluding the company court's jurisdiction over a company in liquidation. The legislative entries also supported that limited construction. Since the society itself was not in liquidation, the broader objection based on total inapplicability did not arise for decision in these applications.

                          Conclusion: The Companies Act was not wholly inapplicable in the manner contended, and the objection to jurisdiction failed.

                          Final Conclusion: The official liquidator succeeded in recovering the post-petition payments, while the society's request for validation was rejected, resulting in a mixed disposal of the connected applications.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Payments made after commencement of winding-up in discharge of pre-existing debts are void unless validated, and validation is available only for bona fide transactions in the ordinary course of the company's current business; a co-operative societies statute excluding the Companies Act operates only in relation to the specified spheres of co-operative society law and does not exclude the company court's winding-up jurisdiction over a company in liquidation.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found