1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate tribunal reduces penalty for accounting error, citing Rule 173Q1(bb). (bb)</h1> The appellate tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on a company for availing excess Modvat credit due to an accounting error from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. ... Modvat - Penalty The appellate tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on a company for availing excess Modvat credit due to an accounting error, from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 25,000. The company, a regular importer, reversed the excess credit upon detection by the Range Office. The tribunal found the penalty to be appropriate despite the company's plea of clerical mistake by a newly recruited clerk. The penalty reduction was based on Rule 173Q1(bb) and the company's regular compliance with duty payments.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
