TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms State of Orissa's ownership of shares, orders rectification.</h1> <h3>Indian Chemical Products Ltd. Versus State of Orissa</h3> Indian Chemical Products Ltd. Versus State of Orissa - [1966] 36 COMP. CAS. 592 (SC) Issues:- Interpretation of company's articles regarding registration of share transfers- Validity of State of Orissa's claim to shares by operation of law- Allegations of mala fide refusal to register share transfer by the board of directors- Applicability of court's jurisdiction under section 38 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913- Legal ownership of shares and rectification of share registerInterpretation of Company's Articles:The judgment dealt with the interpretation of the company's articles concerning the registration of share transfers. The court analyzed the provisions of the articles, specifically focusing on Article 11 and its applicability to the situation at hand. It was highlighted that Article 11 did not confer the board of directors the power to refuse recognition of a devolution of title by operation of law. The court emphasized that the board's discretion to refuse registration must be exercised reasonably and in good faith.Validity of State of Orissa's Claim:The State of Orissa claimed ownership of shares by operation of law due to constitutional changes and the cession of sovereignty by the Maharaja of Mayurbhanj. The judgment detailed the historical background leading to the State's acquisition of the shares. It was established that the shares vested in the State of Orissa as a result of successive constitutional changes and the integration of the State's territories. The court affirmed the State's legal ownership of the shares.Allegations of Mala Fide Refusal:The judgment addressed the issue of the board of directors' alleged mala fide refusal to register the share transfer to the State of Orissa. The court found that the directors' actions were capricious and not based on valid reasons. Despite the State's compliance with all legal formalities, the directors delayed registration on frivolous pretexts. The court emphasized that the directors' discretionary power to refuse registration should be exercised reasonably and in good faith, highlighting the importance of acting in the company's best interests.Applicability of Court's Jurisdiction:The court examined the applicability of its jurisdiction under section 38 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, concerning the rectification of the share register. It was determined that the court's jurisdiction was properly invoked in this case due to the company's failure to recognize the State of Orissa as the legal owner of the shares. The court emphasized the beneficial nature of the jurisdiction under section 38 and stressed the importance of liberal exercise of such powers to ensure justice.Rectification of Share Register:Ultimately, the court concluded that the State of Orissa was entitled to have its name entered in the share register as the legal owner of the shares. The judgment highlighted the company's default in recognizing the State's ownership and the need for rectification of the share register. The court dismissed the company's appeal, emphasizing that justice had been obstructed for too long and ordering the company to carry out the rectification as directed by the lower courts.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment provides a detailed overview of the key issues addressed and the court's findings and conclusions in each aspect of the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
