Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was sustainable when the assessee relied on Notification No. 79/82 for the stage of RG-1 entry in the case of processed fabrics.
Analysis: The requirement for making RG-1 entries in respect of processed fabrics arose only after folding and measurement under Notification No. 79/82 dated 28-3-1982. The authorities below did not properly consider this position. On the facts, the alleged omission to maintain records in terms of Rules 53 and 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not attracted, and the basis for penal action failed.
Conclusion: The penalty on the appellant was not sustainable and was set aside.