Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Company Resolution to Donate to Charity Deemed Ultra Vires, Directors Liable for Refund

        Dr. A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar Versus Life Insurance Corporation of India

        Dr. A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar Versus Life Insurance Corporation of India - [1963] 33 COMP. CAS. 420 (SC), 1963 AIR 1185, 1963 (2) Suppl. SCR 887 Issues Involved:
        1. Validity of the resolution passed by the company to donate Rs. 2 lakhs to a charitable trust.
        2. Authority of the directors under the articles of association to make such a donation.
        3. Ownership and nature of the Shareholders' Dividend Account.
        4. Whether the donation was ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the company.
        5. Personal liability of the trustees to refund the amount.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Validity of the Resolution to Donate Rs. 2 Lakhs:
        The resolution passed on July 15, 1955, by the United India Life Assurance Company Ltd. to donate Rs. 2 lakhs to the M.Ct. M. Chidambaram Chettyar Memorial Trust was challenged. The Corporation alleged that the resolution and the subsequent payments were ultra vires the company and void, as the memorandum of the company did not authorize such payment. The resolution was not in the interests of the company's business and did not provide any direct or substantial advantage to the company.

        2. Authority of Directors Under Articles of Association:
        The appellants argued that the directors were authorized by the articles of association to make donations for charitable or benevolent objects. Specifically, Article 93(t) allowed the directors to make payments towards any charitable or benevolent object. However, this was only permissible if the company had the power under the memorandum of association to achieve the specified object or if it was incidental or conducive to the company's objects. The Tribunal found that the primary object of the company was to carry on life insurance business, and donations to a charitable trust were not incidental or naturally conducive to that object.

        3. Ownership and Nature of the Shareholders' Dividend Account:
        The Shareholders' Dividend Account was constituted under Articles 116 and 117 of the company's articles of association. The account was to hold the surplus allocated to shareholders, but until a dividend was declared, the shareholders had no right to participate in the fund. The fund belonged to the company until a resolution declaring a dividend was passed. The resolution to donate Rs. 2 lakhs did not declare a dividend; hence, the amount remained part of the company's assets.

        4. Ultra Vires Nature of the Donation:
        The court held that the donation was ultra vires the company as it was not within the objects mentioned in the memorandum of association. The memorandum authorized the company to carry on life insurance business and to invest and deal with funds, but not to make charitable donations. The donation had no reasonably proximate connection with the company's objects and was not incidental or conducive to the attainment of those objects. The court referenced Tomkinson v. South Eastern Railway Co., where a similar donation was deemed ultra vires, emphasizing that indirect benefits to the company did not justify the expenditure.

        5. Personal Liability of Trustees:
        The Tribunal directed the appellants to refund the amount, holding them personally liable. Appellants Nos. 2 and 4, being directors at the time, were responsible for passing the ultra vires resolution and were thus liable to make good the amount unlawfully disbursed. Section 15 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956, empowered the Corporation to demand repayment of amounts paid without consideration and not necessary for the controlled business of the insurer. The trustees, having benefited from the payment, were ordered to refund the amount received.

        Conclusion:
        The appeal was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to pay the sum of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest. The resolution to donate the amount was found to be ultra vires the company, and the trustees were held personally liable to refund the amount to the Corporation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found