Rectification for apparent mistake is unavailable where classification turns on a debatable legal view or reasoned analysis.

Rectification is limited to correcting only an obvious and patent mistake apparent from the record. A classification decision reached after considering the material on record cannot be reopened merely because another view is possible, and a debatable question of law or one needing long-drawn reasoning does not qualify as such a mistake. On that basis, the classification dispute was held not to disclose any mistake apparent on record, so the rectification application was not maintainable and was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the rectification application could succeed on the ground that the earlier classification decision contained a mistake apparent on record.

Analysis: Rectification is confined to correcting only an obvious and patent mistake apparent from the record. A classification view taken after considering the material on record does not become rectifiable merely because another view is possible. A debatable question of law or one requiring long-drawn reasoning does not constitute a mistake apparent on record.

Conclusion: The classification dispute did not disclose any mistake apparent on record, and the rectification application was not maintainable. It was rejected.

---