Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee could raise the claim for exemption notification at the appellate stage; (ii) whether the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was available to ramming mass.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee could raise the claim for exemption notification at the appellate stage.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the availability of an exemption notification is a legal question that can be considered at any stage of the proceedings. The objection that the plea had not been taken earlier was rejected, and there was no necessity to send the matter back for reconsideration on that ground.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was available to ramming mass.
Analysis: Relying on its earlier decision in the assessee's own case, the Tribunal held that the notification covered ramming mass used for lining furnaces. On that basis, the claimed exemption was accepted and remand was declined.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was held to be available to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The demand could not be sustained, and the assessee obtained the exemption benefit without remand.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim to exemption under a relevant notification may be entertained at the appellate stage, and where the notification is found applicable to the goods, the exemption must be granted without remand.