Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company could recover from its bank amounts paid on cheques which did not strictly disclose on their face that they were drawn on behalf of the company and which, according to the company, did not comply with section 89 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913.
Analysis: Section 89 protects a company against enforcement of a negotiable instrument unless it is made, drawn, accepted or endorsed in the name of, or by or on behalf of, the company by a person acting under express or implied authority. That requirement makes the instrument ineffective against the company where it is defectively drawn. But the provision operates in the context of liability on the instrument itself and does not govern a dispute between a company and its bank over cheques honoured from the company's account. Where the bank acts on cheques issued by the persons known to be authorised to operate the account and pays them bona fide, the company cannot invoke section 89 to compel repayment merely because the cheques would not have been enforceable against the company if presented as claims on the instrument.
Conclusion: The company could not rely on section 89 to recover the money from the bank, and the bank was not liable to repay the amounts honoured on the cheques.