Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company was liable to be wound up on the grounds that its substratum had disappeared and that it was just and equitable to wind it up.
Analysis: The company had been formed primarily as a banking concern, and its banking business had ceased after regulatory intervention and the subsequent conversion attempt had not restored that business. Although the memorandum contained other powers and objects, the banking business remained the paramount object in the context of the company's structure, name, and articles. The company's funds had been substantially locked in concerns controlled by the dominant shareholder group, recoveries were negligible, and the minority shareholders were receiving no benefit. In these circumstances, continued existence of the company would only serve the interests of the controlling group, while the minority remained without practical relief. The availability of other remedies did not make winding up unreasonable on these facts.
Conclusion: The company's substratum had disappeared and it was just and equitable to wind it up. The petition succeeded.