Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a vesting order under section 153A of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 transfers to the transferee company an accrued right to sue for damages for breach of contract appertaining to the transferor company's undertaking, thereby entitling the transferee to continue a pending suit.
Analysis: Section 153A(4) defines "property" to include rights of every description and section 153A(1)(c) authorises continuation of legal proceedings by or against the transferee. The vesting order operates to transfer property and liabilities by virtue of the court order without requiring a separate conveyance. A "mere" or "bare" right to sue is prohibited from assignment under section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act, but a right to sue that is incidental to and appertains to an undertaking or business forms part of the transferred property. English authorities distinguishing bare rights of action from rights incidental to property/business were treated as persuasive guides; Nokes v. Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd. does not decide that an accrued right to sue appertaining to a business cannot be transferred by a vesting order. Sections 23(g) and 27(d) of the Specific Relief Act corroborate that contracts and related rights may be enforceable by the successor company arising from amalgamation where appropriate.
Conclusion: The vesting order under section 153A of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 transfers the accrued right to sue for damages appertaining to the transferor company's undertaking to the transferee company, and the transferee is entitled to continue the pending suit.