Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether waxing of plain particle board amounted to manufacture and produced a distinct commodity classifiable under Heading 4406.90 rather than as plain particle board.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the tariff scheme under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 treated particle boards in separate varieties, and that waxed particle board acquired water-proofing qualities, a distinct name and a distinct use. It relied on the principle that a process may amount to manufacture where the resulting product is commercially different and on precedents recognising waxing as giving rise to a new commodity.
Conclusion: The waxed particle board was correctly classified under Heading 4406.90, and the assessee's classification claim failed.
Final Conclusion: The lower orders were affirmed and the appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a process such as waxing changes the commercial identity, name and use of goods so that the resulting product is a distinct commodity, the process amounts to manufacture for tariff classification purposes.