Modvat credit on scrap inputs denied where deemed credit covered only specified materials; manganese issue remanded for reconsideration.

Modvat credit was held unavailable for scrap-based inputs such as sheet cutting, S.S. flats rejects and other market-purchased scrap, because deemed credit applied only to inputs specifically covered by the relevant TRU order and waste or scrap under Heading 72.04 was not included. The exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was also denied, as scrap and reject material were not eligible inputs for the manufacture of ingots. On manganese, the record did not clearly establish non-declaration in the Modvat declaration, so that question was remanded for readjudication by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Modvat credit in respect of manganese was liable to be denied for alleged non-declaration in the Modvat declaration and, if so, whether the matter required readjudication; (ii) Whether deemed Modvat credit was admissible on materials described as sheet cutting, S.S. flats rejects and other scrap purchased from the open market; (iii) Whether the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. dated 20-5-1988 was available on such inputs.

Issue (i): Whether Modvat credit in respect of manganese was liable to be denied for alleged non-declaration in the Modvat declaration and, if so, whether the matter required readjudication.

Analysis: The show cause notice did not clearly establish the allegation of non-declaration of manganese, and the supporting annexures were not available on record. The adjudicating authority had also not recorded a finding on this aspect. In the absence of a clear factual foundation, the issue could not be conclusively decided on the existing record.

Conclusion: The question of Modvat credit on manganese was remanded to the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner for readjudication.

Issue (ii): Whether deemed Modvat credit was admissible on materials described as sheet cutting, S.S. flats rejects and other scrap purchased from the open market.

Analysis: Deemed credit under the relevant TRU order was available only for specified inputs. Waste and scrap falling under Heading 72.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 was not one of the specified inputs. The record indicated that the goods were purchased from scrap dealers in the open market and were described as sheet cutting, rejects and similar scrap, which supported the finding that they were not eligible prime inputs for deemed credit.

Conclusion: Deemed Modvat credit on such scrap-based inputs was not admissible.

Issue (iii): Whether the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. dated 20-5-1988 was available on such inputs.

Analysis: The notification did not specify waste and scrap as eligible inputs for the manufacture of ingots. Since the inputs were found to be scrap or reject material, the condition for availing the exemption was not satisfied.

Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was not available.

Final Conclusion: The matter was partly sent back for reconsideration on the limited question of manganese, while the denial of deemed credit and exemption on scrap-based inputs was upheld, and one appeal was allowed to the extent of credit on declared castings and steel wires.

Ratio Decidendi: Deemed Modvat credit and exemption under the notification are available only for inputs specifically prescribed under the relevant order or notification, and scrap or reject material not so prescribed cannot qualify unless the record clearly shows it as an eligible declared input.

---