Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in recalling its ex parte order disposing of the appeal on merits in the absence of the assessee.
Analysis: The ex parte disposal was traceable to Rule 24 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, which permits disposal of an appeal on merits in the absence of the appellant or its authorised representative. The proviso to Rule 24 expressly empowers the Tribunal to recall such an order where it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for non-appearance. The Tribunal recorded satisfaction that the absence was for sufficient reason and, therefore, acted within its recalled power. No substantial question of law arose from the order.
Conclusion: The recall of the ex parte order was upheld and the appeal failed.