Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employee cash security deposits held by the bank for faithful performance of service were trust moneys or merely ordinary deposits forming part of the bank's assets.
Analysis: The deposits were required by service rules, taken as security for good conduct, acknowledged by a special staff security deposit receipt, and kept in a separate account. They were not ordinary bank deposits made for investment or current account purposes. The stipulation for interest did not, by itself, destroy the character of the arrangement as a trust, because a trustee may be authorised to use trust money and pay interest without converting the relationship into that of debtor and creditor. The later statutory policy reflected in section 282-B(1) of the Indian Companies Act supported this view, though it was not directly applicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The security deposits were held in trust for the employees and did not form part of the assets distributable among the bank's general creditors; the applicants were entitled to payment of their respective deposits with interest up to the date of winding up.