Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company had been placed in voluntary liquidation by a valid extraordinary resolution so as to empower the Court to order the respondent to be publicly examined under Section 196 of the Companies Act.
Analysis: The statutory power to direct a public examination under Section 196 was available only if the company was in liquidation. A voluntary winding up under Section 203(3) required an extraordinary resolution that the company could not, by reason of its liabilities, continue its business and that it was advisable to wind up. An extraordinary resolution under Section 81(1) also required prior notice specifying the intention to propose such a resolution. The notice and meeting proceedings did not satisfy these requirements, and the company had not validly passed the resolution contemplated by Section 203(3).
Conclusion: The company was not in voluntary liquidation in accordance with the Act, and the Court had no power to order the respondent's examination under Section 196.