Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a court-appointed liquidator was personally liable on a company contract which he had not disclaimed, and whether the statutory power of disclaimer under section 267 of the Companies Act, 1929, created such personal liability.
Analysis: The liquidator's letter and subsequent conduct did not show an intention to assume personal liability. The contract and the correspondence were throughout treated as dealings with the company through its liquidator. A liquidator appointed by the Court acts as agent of the company, unlike a receiver and manager, who acts for debenture holders and not as the company's agent. The description "liquidator" therefore negatives, rather than supports, an inference of personal contracting. Section 267 of the Companies Act, 1929, merely confers a power to disclaim onerous contracts and contains no clear words imposing personal liability on the liquidator. The contrast with section 54 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1914, reinforced the conclusion that the statutory disclaimer power was not intended to alter the liquidator's personal liabilities.
Conclusion: The liquidator was not personally liable on the contract, and the claim failed.
Final Conclusion: Personal liability could not be inferred against a court-appointed liquidator merely because he had not disclaimed the company's contract, and the statutory disclaimer provision did not convert his representative capacity into personal liability.
Ratio Decidendi: A court-appointed liquidator is the agent of the company, and absent clear statutory words or an express personal undertaking, the mere existence of a power to disclaim an onerous contract does not make the liquidator personally liable on that contract.