Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a water treatment plant fabricated and assembled at site, and fixed to earth by civil work, constituted excisable goods liable to duty under Heading 8421.00 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The Revenue's case was that the plant was manufactured in a knocked down condition and cleared to site for assembly, but the record showed that only vessels and pipes were manufactured in the factory and cleared on duty, while the water treatment plant itself was fabricated at site. There was no evidence that the complete plant was assembled in the factory and then removed in a marketable condition. The plant was permanently attached by civil work, and no material showed that the plant as such could be taken to the market and sold. Applying the marketability principle, goods that cannot be moved and marketed in that form do not satisfy the test of excisability.
Conclusion: The water treatment plant was not excisable goods and no duty was payable on it; the Revenue's appeal failed.