Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned products, manufactured as pharmaceutical blends and said to meet IP/BP standards, were classifiable under Chapter 30 as medicaments or under Chapter 35 as prepared enzymes.
Analysis: The products were shown to be manufactured by blending enzymes with other materials such as lactose and calcium phosphate before packing and despatch. The existing record did not conclusively establish direct prophylactic or therapeutic use, but the fact that the products met IP/BP standards and were controlled under drug law was considered relevant to their character as medicaments. The lower authorities had not adequately examined the drug licence and the end-use or further processing by buyers. The material also required comparison with the cited departmental circulars and the earlier decision relied upon for similar pharmaceutical enzyme products.
Conclusion: The classification issue was not finally determined on merits and the matter was remanded to the Original Authority for fresh adjudication after allowing the appellant to produce material in support of its claim.