Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product 'Dant Manjan Lal' is classifiable as an Ayurvedic medicament under Chapter 30 or as tooth powder for oral hygiene under Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the proper tariff classification of the product. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the same product and found no reason to depart from that conclusion. On that basis, it accepted the classification under Chapter 30 rather than the Revenue's proposed classification under Chapter 33.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classified under Chapter 30 as an Ayurvedic medicament, and the Revenue's appeal was not accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a product is found, on the same factual and legal basis, to fall within the medicinal heading, it is to be classified under Chapter 30 rather than under the heading for oral hygiene preparations.