Modvat credit denied for undeclared HDPE films and rolls where Rule 57G declaration did not cover the inputs.

Modvat credit on HDPE films and rolls was held inadmissible because the inputs were not specifically, or even generally, declared in the prescribed Rule 57G declaration on the relevant date. A minor variation in description could not cure the defect where the tariff position did not support the claimed classification and the goods were not shown to have been validly declared as received. The prior order allowing credit was therefore set aside, and the Revenue's challenge succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit on HDPE films and rolls was admissible when the inputs received were not specifically declared under Rule 57G.

Analysis: Credit under Rule 57G depends on proper declaration of the inputs. The declaration on record did not cover HDPE films and rolls, and even a general declaration of plastic in roll form was not shown to exist on the relevant date. The argument based on minor variation in description could not assist the assessee because the tariff position did not support the claimed classification, and the goods were not shown to have been validly declared as received.

Conclusion: The credit was not admissible, and the Revenue's challenge succeeded.

Final Conclusion: The order allowing credit was set aside and the Revenue's appeal was allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be sustained where the goods received were not specifically or generally declared in the prescribed declaration, and a mere claimed similarity in description does not cure the absence of proper declaration.

---