Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules was admissible in respect of conveyor belt.
Analysis: The conveyor belt was found to be essential for the completion of the manufacturing process of cement and to function as material handling equipment for movement of raw materials. Applying the interpretation of "capital goods" in the Explanation to Rule 57Q(1), goods used for producing the final product, for processing goods for manufacture, or for bringing about change in substances used in manufacture qualify for credit where the requirement is satisfied.
Conclusion: Capital goods credit was admissible on the conveyor belt and the Revenue's challenge failed.