Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic pallets imported for use in storing and conveying goods in industrial or commercial establishments were consumer goods requiring an import licence.
Analysis: The classification of consumer goods in the import policy was examined with emphasis on three elements: the goods must be consumption goods, they must directly satisfy human needs, and they must not require further processing. Plastic pallets were found to be utility articles used mainly for storage, lifting, and transport of goods with forklift assistance. Such use did not directly satisfy human needs in the sense contemplated by the policy, nor did it place the goods in the class of articles intended for consumption by end users. The distinction drawn in the tariff and licensing classification between articles used for packing or conveying consumer goods and articles used in industrial or commercial processes supported this view.
Conclusion: The pallets were not consumer goods and did not require an import licence; the finding to the contrary was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The import was held to be free of the alleged licensing restriction and the appellant succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Articles used primarily as industrial or commercial conveyance and storage aids are not consumer goods unless they directly satisfy human needs without further processing.