TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate tribunal denies modification request due to lack of evidence of financial hardship. Appellant ordered to deposit in one month.</h1> <h3>AVER PHOTOGRAPHIC CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI</h3> AVER PHOTOGRAPHIC CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI - 2001 (132) E.L.T. 321 (Tri. - Mumbai) The appellate tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for modification of an order due to lack of evidence of financial hardship. The tribunal did not accept the self-serving financial documents provided by the appellant as valid evidence. The appellant was given one month to deposit the required amount. The next mention post was set for June 4, 2001.
TaxTMI 