Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the State Agricultural Income-tax authorities could recompute tea income in a manner contrary to the computation already made by the Central Income-tax authorities, and consequently whether the impugned assessments and appellate orders were legally sustainable.
Analysis: The governing principle, as drawn from the earlier Supreme Court decisions relied upon, is that tea income has to be computed in accordance with the Central income-tax scheme and the State Legislature cannot enlarge the taxable agricultural income by permitting its officers to tinker with the computation already made under the Central enactment. If the State authorities consider that the Central assessment is defective, their remedy is to move the Central appellate or revisional machinery and not to substitute their own computation. The deeming provision in section 4(2) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1991, therefore cannot be used to override or vary the computation made by the Central Officers.
Conclusion: The State authorities had no jurisdiction to recompute the agricultural income already computed by the Central Officers, and the assessments made on that contrary basis were invalid and liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: State agricultural income-tax authorities cannot recompute tea income contrary to the computation made under the Central income-tax law; any correction must be sought through the Central appellate or revisional process.