Exemption for iron castings denied where specified processes were applied, as they no longer qualified as unmachined castings.

Unmachined iron castings subjected to the processes covered by the proviso to Notification No. 223/88-C.E. were held not to retain the character of unmachined castings or unmachined cast articles for claiming the broader exemption under Notification No. 275/88-C.E. The argument that the work amounted only to fettling was rejected because fettling was treated as a single process and not a substitute for all the specified processes. The clarification relied upon by the assessee was found inapplicable, and the separate exemption could not be extended by disregarding the conditions attached to the relevant notification framework.

---

---

Issues: Whether unmachined castings of iron that had undergone the specified processes were entitled to full exemption under Notification No. 275/88-C.E. or only to partial exemption under Notification No. 223/88-C.E.

Analysis: The goods were found to have undergone the processes covered by the proviso to Notification No. 223/88-C.E. They could therefore not be treated as unmachined castings or unmachined cast articles for the purpose of the full exemption claimed. The plea that all the processes amounted merely to fettling was rejected, as fettling was held to denote only one process and not all the processes specified in the notification. The clarification relied upon by the appellant was held inapplicable, and the separate exemption under Notification No. 275/88-C.E. could not be extended by ignoring the conditions attached to the applicable notification framework.

Conclusion: The goods were not entitled to full exemption under Notification No. 275/88-C.E. and the denial of that benefit was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are subjected to the processes specifically covered by the proviso to the relevant exemption notification, they cease to qualify as unmachined castings for the purpose of claiming the broader exemption.

---