Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit on a portable platform scale was admissible as capital goods under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and whether such equipment could be treated as a weigh-bridge for the purpose of Rule 57Q(1).
Analysis: The declaration for credit was made in respect of a portable platform scale used for weighing goods manufactured in the factory. The rejection below was based on the absence of a ground-fitted weigh-bridge and on the view that the equipment did not answer the description of the item contemplated by the rule. The appellate body accepted that the assessee was a small unit, that the equipment was actually used for weighment in the manufacturing process, and that the rule did not require the weigh-bridge to be permanently affixed to the ground. On that basis, the departmental challenge to the allowance of credit was found to be weak.
Conclusion: Credit was held admissible and the portable weighing machine was treated as falling within the relevant capital goods description for Rule 57Q(1), in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeal failed and the order allowing credit on the portable scale was sustained.