Customs valuation of imported spares excludes unrelated technology transfer fees where no nexus exists with the goods.

Technology transfer fee was held not to form part of the assessable value of imported spares under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, because the payment related to disclosure of know-how, technical advice, and development assistance for agricultural land development, not to the imported goods themselves. Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) applies only to engineering, development, art work, design work, and plans or sketches undertaken outside India that are necessary for producing the imported goods, and that nexus was absent here. The imported items were spares rather than capital goods, the cited precedents were distinguishable, and the addition to value under Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) was therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the technology transfer fee payable under the agreement was liable to be added to the assessable value of the imported spares under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

Analysis: The payment under the agreement was for disclosure of know-how, technical advice, and development-related assistance in connection with agricultural land development. The agreement did not show any connection between that payment and the imported spares. Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) applies to payments for engineering, development, art work, design work, and plans or sketches undertaken elsewhere than in India and necessary for the production of the imported goods. The imported goods here were spares, not capital goods for which the technical fee was paid, and the cited precedents concerning capital goods and patented technology were distinguishable. The record also showed that the spares were not meant for sale in the market.

Conclusion: The technology transfer fee was not includible in the assessable value of the imported goods, and the addition made under Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) was unsustainable.

---