1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal grants refund to Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. under Notification No. 239/86-C.E.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal by M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd., granting a refund of Rs. 9,765.50 under Notification No. ... Exemption The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal by M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. regarding a refund claim of Rs. 9,765.50 related to Notification No. 239/86-C.E. The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal and granted the refund, subject to the law of unjust enrichment as per the Supreme Court's decision in Mafatlal Industries v. Union of India - 1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (S.C.).