TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the confirmed duty demand in respect of wrongly availed Modvat credit could be sustained, and (ii) whether the penalties imposed under Rule 57-I(4) and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were justified or required reduction/set aside.
Issue (i): whether the confirmed duty demand in respect of wrongly availed Modvat credit could be sustained.
Analysis: The duty liability was not contested before the Tribunal. The record showed that Modvat credit had been taken on inputs not received in the factory and on damaged inputs not used in the manufacture of final products, and the demand related to such inadmissible credit.
Conclusion: The demand of central excise duty was sustained.
Issue (ii): whether the penalties imposed under Rule 57-I(4) and Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were justified or required reduction/set aside.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the credit had been availed and retained for a considerable period even where the inputs had not been received or were damaged and unusable. On those facts, the conduct was not bona fide. At the same time, the circumstances justified imposition of only a moderated penalty, and the further penalty under Rule 173Q did not survive.
Conclusion: The penalty under Rule 57-I(4) was reduced to Rs. 20,00,000, and the penalty under Rule 173Q was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand was maintained, but the penal consequences were substantially curtailed by reducing one penalty and deleting the other.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inadmissible Modvat credit is retained and utilised on inputs not received or not usable in manufacture, the duty demand may be sustained, but penalty must still be calibrated to the facts and may be reduced when the overall circumstances do not warrant the full amount imposed.
TaxTMI 
