Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit of duty paid on inputs was admissible when the processed fabrics were removed without payment of duty under Rule 13 for manufacture of export garments, and whether such clearances attracted Rule 57C.
Analysis: The clearance of processed fabrics under Rule 13, read with the procedure prescribed in Chapter X and the notification governing such removals, was treated as giving effect to the statutory scheme for export-related removals rather than as a substantive exemption from duty. Since the notification did not create a duty exemption, the basis for invoking Rule 57C was absent. The earlier tribunal decision on the same point was followed.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and Rule 57C did not apply. The appeals failed.