Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether scrap oxide lump grades B-80.14% and C-74% arising during manufacture of lead alloy were classifiable under Heading No. 78.02 as waste and scrap of lead, or under Heading No. 26.20 as ash and residues.
Analysis: The goods arose during manufacture of lead alloy in which lead predominated by weight. Section Note 4 of Section XV treats a reference to metal as including alloys, and Section Note 6 defines waste and scrap as metal waste and scrap from the manufacture or mechanical working of metals. Chapter 26, on the other hand, covers ores, slag and ash, and Chapter Note 3 confines Heading No. 26.20 to ash and residues used for extraction of metals or for manufacture of chemical compounds of metals. The goods in question were generated during the manufacturing process of alloy and not from the treatment of ores or from processes of the kind contemplated by Heading No. 26.20.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading No. 78.02 and not under Heading No. 26.20.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the classification dispute and the departmental view on tariff classification was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Waste generated during manufacture of a metal alloy is classifiable as waste and scrap under Section XV, and not as ash and residues under Chapter 26 unless it answers the specific tariff description in that heading.