Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a fresh declaration under Rule 57G was required when a manufacturer, after having earlier filed a declaration to avail Modvat credit, switched over from full exemption back to the Modvat scheme.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the manufacturer had already filed a declaration for availing Modvat credit and had previously benefited from the Modvat scheme. The only dispute was whether, after opting for exemption and then returning to Modvat, a second declaration became necessary. Relying on its earlier decision, the Tribunal held that once the requisite declaration had already been filed, the switch back from full exemption to Modvat did not create any fresh obligation to file a new declaration.
Conclusion: No fresh declaration was required, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a manufacturer has already filed a valid declaration for Modvat credit, reverting from exemption to the Modvat scheme does not require a fresh declaration under Rule 57G.