Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ceramic lined bends and ceramic lined elbows, after lining with ceramic tiles and intended for use in industrial boilers, were classifiable as parts of boilers under Chapter 84 or as parts of general use under Chapter 73.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether the lining process had given the items a distinct character as specialised boiler parts so that the exclusion for parts of general use under Note 1(g) of Section XVI would no longer apply. The items had undergone ceramic lining and were admitted to be used in boilers. The same treatment had already led to classification of similar lined items under Chapter 84, and the reasoning applied to those items was equally applicable here. Once the goods acquired special characteristics for boiler use, they could not be treated as ordinary articles of iron and steel under Chapter 73.
Conclusion: The ceramic lined bends and ceramic lined elbows were held to be parts of boilers classifiable under Chapter 84, and not parts of general use under Chapter 73.
Ratio Decidendi: Where base metal items undergo a process that gives them a specialised character and exclusive use as machinery parts, they cease to be parts of general use and must be classified according to their specialised end use.