Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether acrylic yarn containing 100% acrylic fibres was correctly classifiable under sub-heading 5504.32 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether the duty demand raised under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be sustained.
Analysis: The classification declared by the respondents under sub-heading 5504.32 had been accepted and approved in the classification lists effective from 1-3-1986, and no material showed any review of that classification before issuance of the show cause notice. The tariff position was also supported by the view that yarn containing 100% acrylic is classifiable under sub-heading 5504.32 and not under sub-heading 5504.90.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the respondents was correct and the duty demand was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the impugned order dropping the proceedings was maintained.