Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, having opted in its classification list and declaration not to avail the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-C.E., could later claim the exemption for subsequent clearances during the same financial year.
Analysis: Paragraph 4 of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. expressly permits a manufacturer to opt not to avail the exemption, but once that option is exercised, duty becomes payable on all subsequent clearances made after the option in that financial year. The assessee had admittedly filed the classification list and declaration opting out of the exemption. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were distinguished because they did not involve a similar express restriction on changing the option after election. The separate contention regarding the applicable rate of duty was not decided in the absence of the relevant adjudication order.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to claim the exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. for the relevant period after having opted not to avail it, and duty was payable without the benefit of that notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification makes the manufacturer's option not to avail the exemption binding for the financial year, the assessee cannot resile from that election and claim the exemption for later clearances in the same year.