Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an electronic weighing machine was eligible for capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods in the Explanation to Rule 57Q covered machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about a change in any substance for manufacture. An electronic weighing machine did not itself produce or process goods or bring about any change in the substance, but its function was akin to a weighbridge, which was specifically included in the Explanation. The Tribunal also relied on earlier decisions treating weighing machines as necessary equipment connected with manufacture and marketing of goods.
Conclusion: The denial of capital goods credit on the electronic weighing machine was unjustified and the assessee was entitled to the credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Equipment used integrally in the manufacturing process, though not directly effecting physical change in goods, may qualify as capital goods where its function is materially comparable to specifically included equipment and it has a necessary nexus with manufacture.