1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CEGAT Rules Inflatable Raft Classification; Duty Recovery Notice Unsustainable</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled that the inflatable rubber raft should be classified under heading 8907.00 for duty liability, rejecting the ... Classification - Demand The legal judgment by Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai involved the classification of an inflatable rubber raft for duty liability. The goods were classified under heading 8907.00 by the department, while the appellant claimed classification under 8906.00. The appellant's claim was supported by a certificate from the Mercantile Marine Department. The goods were correctly classified under 8907.00 as inflatable rafts are considered floating structures under this heading. A notice proposing duty recovery for goods cleared in certain periods was found unsustainable due to a Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was allowed in part, with consequential relief if permitted by law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
