Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was chargeable under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 on duty withheld in respect of warehoused goods cleared within the permitted period pursuant to a court order, and whether the questions raised required reference.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view on an identical issue and held that Section 61(2) applies only where warehoused goods are removed beyond the warehousing period. Where clearance takes place within the permitted period under judicial protection and the duty is paid later after the dispute is resolved, there was at the relevant time no express statutory provision authorising levy of interest. In the absence of any direction in the court order to pay interest, no demand for interest could be sustained, and the questions were not fit for reference.
Conclusion: The demand for interest was not sustainable and the request for reference was declined.
Final Conclusion: The application failed and stood dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory provision or a court direction, interest cannot be levied on duty paid after clearance of warehoused goods within the permitted period.