Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules was admissible on the disputed items, including the package air conditioner, as capital goods or as parts and accessories of the main machinery.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q was construed broadly and was held to cover not only production machinery but also its parts and accessories. The disputed items were treated as covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, and the larger Bench view was applied that the amendments introduced by Notification 11/95 and Notification 14/96 were clarificatory. In relation to the package air conditioner, the evidence accepted was that it was an integral accessory required for the proper functioning of the DG set and its control panels, and the Revenue did not rebut that stand.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the disputed items, including the package air conditioner, and the Revenue's appeal failed.