Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pollution control equipment qualified as capital goods for the purpose of Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the principle that treatment of effluents and pollution control facilities form an essential and integral part of the manufacturing process. It relied on the Supreme Court's view that apparatus used for effluent treatment is part and parcel of manufacture, and followed the same approach in later Tribunal decisions. The change introduced by Notification No. 14/96-C.E. (N.T.) was noted, but the present dispute was decided on the basis of the applicable legal position during the relevant period and the binding nature of the Supreme Court's reasoning.
Conclusion: Pollution control equipment was held eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q(1), and the Revenue's challenge failed.